Tuesday, September 20, 2016
Sunday, January 24, 2016
Wednesday, January 20, 2016
Sarah Palin and leading from behind
Sarah has endorsed Trump for President.
I haven't read the entire speech, but I found this part curious (quote copied from above linked article):
I say curious because it has always been my understanding that Christ was a shepherd and shepherds basically, lead from behind. How did that become a bad thing?
I haven't read the entire speech, but I found this part curious (quote copied from above linked article):
"because a weak-kneed, capitulator-in-chief has decided America will lead from behind"
I say curious because it has always been my understanding that Christ was a shepherd and shepherds basically, lead from behind. How did that become a bad thing?
Questions about Hillary Rodham Clinton
Charles Pierce discusses the NYT obsession with Bill Clinton's penis.
While I appreciate that there was, indeed, a half-vast right wing conspiracy against Clinton and that the whole impeachment thing was BS, I'm not sure Hillary Rodham Clinton should be let off the hook quite as completely and easily as Pierce seems to do.
It's the old saying "Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean people aren't out to get you". Just because it is possible to dismiss a lot of what the NYT columnists might say, it doesn't mean there isn't some justification for it. The Clintons apparently did attempt to disparage Bill's accusers in a way that would be completely unacceptable if it were done to an not famous woman accusing an not famous man of rape. You can dismiss the NYT columnists, but HRC had some role in that and it is likely to be an issue come the real election.
If I get the chance, I will vote for Bernie in the primaries. If HRC wins, I will gladly vote for her. She has lots of positives and just a few negatives for me. All of the candidates on the Republican side have lots of negatives and almost no positives so its no contest.
While I appreciate that there was, indeed, a half-vast right wing conspiracy against Clinton and that the whole impeachment thing was BS, I'm not sure Hillary Rodham Clinton should be let off the hook quite as completely and easily as Pierce seems to do.
It's the old saying "Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean people aren't out to get you". Just because it is possible to dismiss a lot of what the NYT columnists might say, it doesn't mean there isn't some justification for it. The Clintons apparently did attempt to disparage Bill's accusers in a way that would be completely unacceptable if it were done to an not famous woman accusing an not famous man of rape. You can dismiss the NYT columnists, but HRC had some role in that and it is likely to be an issue come the real election.
If I get the chance, I will vote for Bernie in the primaries. If HRC wins, I will gladly vote for her. She has lots of positives and just a few negatives for me. All of the candidates on the Republican side have lots of negatives and almost no positives so its no contest.
Wednesday, January 13, 2016
And we didn't have to send any missles this time
Charles Pierce covers the Iran giving us back our sailors crisis.
The title of this post is from his story. And then of course the usual muscle flexing from the Republican candidates. It's sad really.
The title of this post is from his story. And then of course the usual muscle flexing from the Republican candidates. It's sad really.
Wednesday, January 6, 2016
Monday, December 28, 2015
Real science is amazing
I just read the most amazing article in Scientific American about a
clinic in Strasburg, PA that specializes in studying and treating rare
genetic disorders found in Amish and Mennonite communities. The article
details using real science to determine genetic defects and how in some
cases, that science is used to develop specific nutritional/medical
interventions to counteract and/or cure the resulting disease.
Real science is amazing! I say "real science" to distinguish it from all the woo-woo being presented on line. Yes, nutrition can mitigate the bad effects of disease, but there are no miracle cures. It takes good, hard, real science to determine the problem and to develop the solution.
Unfortunately, you can't read the article without subscribing but here's a link to a shorter article written by the director of the clinic.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/…/clinic-genomics-can-im…/
Here is a brief summary of some of the original article:
Real science is amazing! I say "real science" to distinguish it from all the woo-woo being presented on line. Yes, nutrition can mitigate the bad effects of disease, but there are no miracle cures. It takes good, hard, real science to determine the problem and to develop the solution.
Unfortunately, you can't read the article without subscribing but here's a link to a shorter article written by the director of the clinic.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/…/clinic-genomics-can-im…/
Here is a brief summary of some of the original article:
“Mark” was brought to the Clinic for Special Children in
Strasburg, PA. He was “frail and socially detached. He lay on
the floor in constant, restless motion. His eyes roamed but did not fix,
and he was unmoved by sound”. Test results indicated that
Mark suffered from a deficiency of 5,10-methylene-tetrahydrofolate reductase
(MTHFR) and they discovered an error in the his MTHFR-coding genes. MTHFR
deficiency results in depriving the brain of methionine and CH3. An over
the counter compound, betaine, supplies the brain with these compounds by an
alternative metabolic pathway. They provided the betaine to Mark, monitored
his blood and titrated the dosage as needed. Mark recovered somewhat,
took his first steps and began responding to light and sound, but the damage
was done and he is still disabled.
The clinic developed a test for the genetic defect. The
first case they found in a newborn turned out to be Mark’s sister. They
started her treatment about 2 weeks after she was born and today she is “an
accomplished student, affectionate daughter and formidable stickball
player”. The treatment costs about 60 cents per day. It doesn’t
specifically say so in the article, but the implication is this is now a
standard, ongoing protocol
Another disease in the communities – GA1 – was usually
misdiagnosed as multiple sclerosis and a third, known as maple syrup urine
disease (MSUD) which makes the urine smell like maple syrup. They’ve
developed nutritional interventions for each of these which mitigate the health
problems.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
